Sponsored Links
SEARCH THIS SITE
JBSOLIS is a site for overseas Filipino workers, Philhealth and insurances, OWWA, PAG-IBIG, bank and cash loans, foreclosed properties, small house designs, local and overseas job listings.
EXCHANGE RATE HERE, CHOOSE CURRENCY
Advertisement

Friday, October 21, 2016

AMERICA DOESN'T NEED THE PHILIPPINES- NEW YORK TIMES WRITER

AMERICA DOESN'T NEED THE PHILIPPINES

In the Opinion Pages of The New York Times(nytimes.com),a certain former special assistant to President Ronald Reagan,by the name of Doug Bandow said that America doesn't need the Philippines and President Duterte is not a reliable ally.Of course,that is his own opinion and we respect that.

The article reads:

"America is a curious great power. It cowers before international lightweights, begging the least significant nations to let it defend them. Such as the Philippines.
President Rodrigo Duterte has gained notoriety for the official murder of thousands of drug users and dealers. He then publicly insulted President Obama for criticizing this murderous policy.
United States credibility suffers when a nation long subsidized and defended by America shows such ostentatious disrespect. The Philippine president shouldn’t be treated like a co-equal and ally if he doesn’t behave like one.
Moreover, the Philippines needs America far more than America needs the Philippines. Manila spends less than 1 percent of its gross domestic product on its military and its best ships are U.S. cast-offs. It doesn’t help defend the United States from anyone.

Rather, Manila expects Washington’s protection even though the archipelago matters little for the United States. America retains the Pacific as a barrier and faces no serious threats to its homeland.


Of course, Washington sees domination of East Asia as an American birthright. Base access obviously helps the U.S. attempt to enforce its will. However, convenience does not translate into interests substantial enough to risk war.
The region matters far more to nearby China, which understandably does not want to be contained. It also costs Beijing far less to deter U.S. intervention than it does for America to project power: missiles and subs are less costly than aircraft carrier groups. With no one threatening free navigation, Washington must decide what kind of risk it is willing to take on behalf of what remain primarily other nations’ territorial interests.
Insisting on defending the Philippines irrespective of its actions is particularly dangerous. Manila relies on American support rather than its own military in confronting China and could drag the United States into a conflict easily.


Washington should drop the “mutual” defense treaty and joint patrols. Maintaining base access is good insurance but does not require a security guarantee, especially over contested territory, such as Scarborough Shoal. Moreover, such access is not worth paying any price: America lost no influence when Subic Bay and Clark Airfield closed decades ago.


President Duterte is not a reliable ally. The United States should not allow such an unpredictable regime to be a trigger for war."

We live in a democratic society and everyone is entitled to his own opinion and as I have said,we respect everyone.Feel free to share your sentiments.

On the other hand,a debater by the name Malcolm Cook , a senior fellow at Iseas-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore and a visiting professor at Ateneo de Manila University in the Philippines,disagreed with Bandow and said the America needs the Philippines for its strategic location.
"Missiles from China’s nuclear-armed submarines would transit through the Luzon Strait. The U.S. benefits from continued access to Philippine bases," he said.